The Supreme Court of India has rejected UCO Bank’s plea that an employee who was dismissed for misconduct was not entitled to pension. The court held that the bank’s decision to dismiss the employee was not valid as it was based on an incomplete inquiry and did not follow the proper procedures.
The employee, who was a manager at the bank, was dismissed in 2013 after allegations of misconduct were made against him. The bank conducted an inquiry and found him guilty of the charges, leading to his dismissal. However, the employee challenged the decision in court, arguing that the inquiry was incomplete and did not follow the proper procedures.
The Supreme Court agreed with the employee’s argument, stating that the inquiry was not conducted in accordance with the bank’s rules and regulations. The court found that the inquiry report was based on incomplete and unreliable evidence, and that the bank’s decision to dismiss the employee was not supported by sufficient evidence.
As a result, the Supreme Court ruled that the employee was entitled to his job and benefits, including pension. The court ordered the bank to reinstate the employee with full back wages and benefits, including pension.
This ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for employees who are dismissed without a fair inquiry and proper procedures. It highlights the importance of following proper procedures and ensuring that inquiries are conducted in a fair and transparent manner.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision in this case reinforces the importance of fair and transparent decision-making processes in the workplace. It also underscores the need for employers to follow their own rules and regulations, and to ensure that employees are treated fairly and justly.