Star Health and Allied Insurance, established in 2006, distinguishes itself as India’s first standalone health insurance provider. Headquartered in Chennai, the company focuses primarily on the health insurance segment, offering a comprehensive suite of products catering to individuals, families, senior citizens, and those with pre-existing medical conditions. Beyond individual and family plans, Star Health also provides group health insurance solutions for corporates, as well as personal accident and overseas travel insurance. The company has built a significant presence across India with a vast network of hospitals for cashless claim settlements and numerous branch offices. Star Health utilizes a multi-channel distribution network, including agents, brokers, and digital platforms, to reach a wide customer base. A key aspect of their business model is their in-house claim settlement process, which aims for efficiency and customer convenience. Star Health has established a strong market position as a leading private health insurer in India, emphasizing customer-centricity and a wide range of health-focused insurance products.

Latest News on Star Health And Allied Insurance

Top Health Insurance Plans in India for 2026: A Comprehensive Comparison of Coverage and Premiums

Choosing the right health insurance plan can be a daunting task, but it’s essential to prioritize finding a plan that provides the most value for your money and meets your unique requirements. Value for money in health insurance means that the premiums you pay are justified by the benefits the policy offers, such as inpatient coverage, outpatient coverage, cashless treatments, and a wide hospital network.

When selecting a health insurance plan, there are several factors to consider. First, it’s essential to assess the plan’s benefits and ensure they align with your needs. Some of the top health insurance plans that offer the best value for money include ACKO Health Insurance, HDFC ERGO Health, Care Health Insurance, and Star Health Insurance. These plans offer features such as no room rent restrictions, automatic restoration of sum insured, higher coverage options, and comprehensive family floater coverage.

To choose the best health insurance plan, consider your family needs and life stages. For example, a youth may require basic hospitalization insurance, while a family may require broader protection. Additionally, consider the needs of senior citizens, who may require more medical attention and therefore higher premiums. It’s also crucial to compare quotes and providers, checking for customer reviews, the insurance company’s reputation, claim-settlement ratio, and other terms and conditions.

Some key features to look for in a health insurance plan include cashless treatments, a wide hospital network, and sufficient coverage for you and your family. The plan should also have an excellent claim-settlement ratio and be from a reputable insurance company. Ultimately, the best health insurance policy is one that meets all your requirements and provides necessary benefits for the future.

In conclusion, when choosing a health insurance plan, it’s essential to prioritize value for money and consider your unique requirements. By assessing your needs, comparing plans, and looking for key features, you can find a plan that provides the best value for your money and meets your needs. Remember to consider your age, family size, health status, and finances before buying a health insurance policy, and always choose a plan from a reputable insurance company with an excellent claim-settlement ratio. By doing so, you can ensure that you and your family have access to quality healthcare when you need it most.

Insurers to charge 18% GST on agents’ commission, Input Tax Credit issue

The Indian government’s decision to reduce the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on health insurance premiums from 18% to 0% has had an unintended consequence on the insurance industry. Insurers are now imposing an 18% GST on commissions paid to agents and distributors to offset losses from the withdrawal of input tax credit (ITC). This move has come as a major blow to insurance intermediaries across the country.

The GST cut means that insurers can no longer claim ITC on commissions, rewards, and other corporate expenses such as rent, technology, and manpower. As a result, insurers are passing on the GST cost to agents and distributors, which could squeeze smaller distributors and individual agents. For example, if the commission for a sale is Rs 100, the amount payable will reduce by 18% to Rs 84.74.

Industry experts warn that this new structure could make health insurance distribution less profitable or unviable for many agents, unless companies revise commission structures or offer alternative incentives. While customers may gain marginally from lower premiums, the ripple effects are being felt sharply across the industry. Insurers face higher operating costs, and distributors face lower earnings.

The problem stems from how the GST framework treats exemptions. For a company to claim input tax credit, there must be a GST component on its output. With the health insurance sector’s GST set to nil, insurers lose this offset mechanism, and expenses on rent, IT systems, advertising, outsourcing, and agent commissions will add up as unrecoverable costs.

Several insurance companies, including Aditya Birla Health Insurance, Care Health Insurance, Star Health Insurance, and ICICI Lombard General Insurance, have acknowledged the challenge and are passing on the GST cost to distributors. They have reiterated their commitment to passing on the entire GST benefit to customers, but noted that the exemption benefits customers while simultaneously increasing operational costs for insurers. The companies have stated that they will absorb the impact of GST on expenses, but will pass on the GST on commissions to distributors to maintain equilibrium and protect customer interests.

Top Insurers With Maximum Grievances Revealed By Insurance Ombudsman: All You Need To Know

The Council of Insurance Ombudsman Annual Report 2023-24 has revealed a significant rise in complaints against health insurance companies in India. The report shows that the total number of complaints against health insurance companies increased by 21.7% in FY 2023-24, with 31,490 complaints, compared to 25,873 in FY 22-23. Private insurers accounted for the majority of complaints, with 26,064 grievances, while public sector insurers had 5,298 complaints.

Star Health & Allied Insurance topped the list with the highest number of complaints, with 13,308 grievances, of which 10,196 were related to claim repudiations. Other top insurers with high complaint numbers included CARE Health Insurance, Niva Bupa Health Insurance, National Insurance, and New India Assurance. The report also highlights that claim repudiation is the most common grievance, with the majority of complaints falling under this category.

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has responded to the rising dissatisfaction by mandating every insurer to appoint an Internal Ombudsman (IO) to review cases up to Rs 50 lakh that remain unresolved after 30 days or are rejected by insurers. However, experts argue that the independence of the IO is questionable since they report to the insurer’s top management, which may raise concerns about fairness and impartiality.

The report emphasizes the need for stronger accountability, transparency, and consumer protection in the health insurance sector. Policyholders are advised to look beyond premiums when buying health insurance and consider critical factors such as claim settlement ratio, repudiation rates, grievance redressal track record, and customer service quality. The IRDAI’s initiative to appoint an Internal Ombudsman is a step towards addressing the rising complaints, but its effectiveness and independence remain to be seen.

The Council for Insurance Ombudsmen (CIO) plays a crucial role in providing an alternative grievance redressal platform for policyholders. The CIO functions under the IRDA Act, 1999, and the Redressal of Public Grievances Rules, 1998, and is designed to provide a speedy and cost-effective mechanism to resolve disputes against insurance companies, intermediaries, or brokers. The report highlights the need for informed choices and stronger regulation to restore policyholder trust in the health insurance sector.

Health insurers fuel non-life premium growth due to GST benefits.

The non-life insurance industry in India experienced a significant boost in December, with a 14% year-on-year increase in gross direct premium collections, reaching ₹28,446.82 crore. This growth is the second-strongest monthly expansion in the industry, following a substantial 24.2% jump in November. The main driver behind this surge was the performance of standalone health insurers, which reported a 39% year-on-year rise in premiums, reaching ₹4,260.10 crore. Star Health and Allied Insurance, the largest player, saw its premiums climb 24% to ₹1,712 crore.

The growth in the health segment can be attributed to the government’s decision to exempt GST on individual health insurance policies, making them more affordable and stimulating demand. Public sector general insurers also demonstrated healthy growth, with a 15% increase in gross premium collections to ₹10,126.36 crore. National Insurance reported a 37% surge in premium income to ₹1,520.36 crore. Private players, including ICICI Lombard and HDFC Ergo General Insurance, also contributed significantly to the growth, with a 15% year-on-year increase in gross direct premiums to ₹13,621.42 crore.

The outlook for the non-life insurance industry remains positive, with brokerage firm Emkay Global anticipating continued healthy growth in the December 2025 quarter. The growth is expected to be driven by strength in both the motor and health insurance segments. The retail health segment is poised for robust expansion, directly benefiting from increased affordability following GST exemptions. Additionally, growth in motor insurance is likely to be driven by strong new-vehicle sales, potentially aided by prior GST rate adjustments. Overall, the non-life insurance industry in India is expected to continue its growth momentum, driven by increasing demand for health and motor insurance products. With the government’s support and growing awareness among consumers, the industry is likely to experience sustained growth in the coming months.

From Commissions to Care, ETHealthworld

The Indian health insurance industry is experiencing rapid growth, with increasing premiums and a rising number of policyholders. However, beneath the surface, there are concerns that the system is becoming inefficient and prioritizing profits over patient care. The Medical Loss Ratio (MLR), which measures the percentage of premiums spent on patient claims, is a key indicator of an insurance system’s efficiency. In India, the MLR is alarmingly low, with some companies spending as little as 58% of premiums on medical care.

An analysis of the financial disclosures of standalone health insurance companies in India reveals that a significant portion of premiums is being absorbed by commissions, administration, and management overhead. For example, Star Health Insurance spent 15% of premiums on commissions and 17% on management expenses, while Care Health Insurance spent 20% on commissions and 22% on management expenses. This leaves a relatively small amount for actual medical care.

In contrast, global benchmarks suggest that at least 80-85% of premiums should be spent on patient care. In countries like the US, Germany, France, and the Netherlands, regulatory measures are in place to ensure that administrative and sales costs are capped, allowing the bulk of contributions to flow towards treatment.

The Indian health insurance industry’s focus on selling policies rather than funding care has led to a breakdown of trust between customers, hospitals, and insurers. Patients are often forced to pay out of pocket or battle for approvals, despite paying rising premiums. To address this issue, regulators must set MLR thresholds, forcing insurers to spend at least 80-85% of premiums on patient care. Additionally, costs of customer acquisitions and management expenses must be reduced to single digits.

The article concludes that the Indian health insurance industry needs to shift its focus from aggressively selling policies to transparently funding care. Unless efficiency improves and regulations enforce higher MLR thresholds, the promise of health insurance will remain unfulfilled, leaving patients and hospitals short-changed. The industry must prioritize funding healthcare over corporate profits and move towards a more transparent and patient-centric model.

Stock Market Updates for Star Health And Allied Insurance

Recent Updates

AHPI seeks immediate restoration of cashless services by Star Health

The Association of Healthcare Providers of India (AHPI) has appealed to Star Health and Allied Insurance to reinstate cashless services at their member hospitals. This decision comes after the insurance company suspended these facilities, resulting in growing distress and inconvenience for patients. Several prominent hospital chains and tertiary care centers have been affected, including Care Hospitals, Manipal Hospitals, Max Hospitals, and Medanta Hospital, among others.

The AHPI has also highlighted the issue of delays or refusals in empaneling new hospitals, which restricts patient choice and forces them to opt for reimbursement claims instead of cashless treatment. This defeats the purpose of health insurance, which patients buy with the expectation of receiving cashless treatment at quality hospitals. According to Girdhar Gyani, Director General of AHPI, and Abul Hasan, Chairman of the Indian Medical Association Hospital Board, it is unjust for insurers to withhold cashless facilities after collecting premiums.

The AHPI has demanded that cashless services be restored immediately and that the empanelment of new hospitals be expedited to ensure uninterrupted access to healthcare. The association has clarified that its decision is a response to Star Health’s actions and not a unilateral move, as suggested by the General Insurance Council (GIC). The AHPI remains open to engagement with stakeholders but has emphasized that protecting patient welfare must remain the top priority.

The suspension of cashless services has significant implications for patients, who may be forced to bear the financial burden of medical treatment out of pocket. The AHPI’s appeal highlights the need for insurance companies to prioritize patient welfare and ensure that policyholders receive the benefits they are entitled to. By reinstating cashless services and expediting empanelment, Star Health and Allied Insurance can help alleviate the distress and inconvenience caused to patients and restore trust in the healthcare system. Ultimately, the AHPI’s efforts aim to ensure that patients have access to quality healthcare without financial hardship.

The latest claim settlement ratio of health and general insurance companies was released by IRDA in 2025. According to the data, Navi and Acko have taken the lead, while Star Health and Zuno have fallen below the 90% mark.

The rising medical inflation has made it challenging for individuals to bear medical expenses without a comprehensive health insurance policy. In India, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDAI) releases an annual list of claim settlements by health and general insurance companies. The claim settlement ratio, which refers to the percentage of claims paid or settled by an insurer, is a reliable way to assess an insurer’s efficiency.

According to the latest figures for 2023-2024, the general insurers paid out a total of 71,200,854 claims, with 81.13% of total claims paid within 3 months of claim intimation. Among private general insurers, Acko General Insurance and Navi General Insurance Ltd led with claim settlement ratios of 99.91% and 99.97%, respectively. Zuno General Insurance Co. Ltd had the lowest claim settlement ratio among private sector insurers, with 83.12% of claims paid within 3 months.

Among public insurers, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd had the lowest claim settlement ratio, with only 65.08% of claims paid within 3 months. United India Insurance Co. Ltd had the highest claim settlement ratio among public insurers, with 96.33% of claims paid within 3 months.

For stand-alone health insurers, Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company had the highest claim settlement ratio within 3 months, at 92.97%. Care Health Insurance and Niva Bupa Health Insurance followed closely, with claim settlement ratios of 92.77% and 92.02%, respectively. Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd had the lowest claim settlement ratio among stand-alone health insurers, with 82.31% of claims paid within 3 months.

While checking the claim settlement ratio is necessary, it should not be the sole basis for finalizing a health or general insurance company. Other factors such as the sum insured, waiting period for various illnesses, and network of hospitals offered should also be considered.

The IRDAI data also reveals that during 2023-24, 16.3% of total claims were paid out between 3-6 months, indicating that some insurers may have delayed claim settlements. It is essential for policyholders to review the claim settlement ratio and other factors before selecting an insurer to ensure they receive adequate and prompt financial assistance in case of medical emergencies.

Overall, the claim settlement ratio is a crucial factor in assessing an insurer’s efficiency, and policyholders should carefully evaluate this metric along with other factors before making an informed decision. By doing so, they can ensure that they have a comprehensive health insurance policy that provides them with the necessary financial protection in case of medical emergencies.

Star Health under IRDAI scrutiny over health insurance claim settlement practices

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has discovered significant lapses in the claim settlement practices of Star Health and Allied Insurance, a stand-alone health insurer. The regulator is likely to take action against the company, although official investigations are still ongoing. IRDAI has also scrutinized 8-10 other general and health insurers, but no action has been reported against them. The regulator examined various claim-related aspects, including the number of claims repudiated and accepted, deductions, and queries raised by policyholders.

According to IRDAI’s handbook of insurance statistics, Star Health’s incurred claim ratio for the year 2023-2024 was 66.47%, which means that for every Rs 100 collected as premiums, the company paid approximately Rs 67 towards honoring policyholder claims. This is marginally higher than the total incurred claim ratio of stand-alone health insurers, but significantly lower than the cumulative incurred claim ratio for all health and general insurers.

Star Health also recorded the lowest claim settlement ratio within 3 months among all stand-alone health insurers, at 82.31% for the year 2023-24. The company repudiated or rejected 2,96,356 claims between 2023-24, which is significantly more than other insurers in the same category. Additionally, Star Health received the maximum number of complaints during the year, at 16,804, which is the highest amongst all general and health insurers in the country.

In response to the allegations, Star Health stated that they have not received any communication from IRDAI on this matter and that they are committed to a customer-centric approach. The company claimed that IRDAI’s audits and inspections are a routine process to ensure compliance across the industry and that the media statement appeared to be speculative and motivated in nature.

The findings of IRDAI’s investigation have raised concerns about Star Health’s claim settlement practices and its commitment to policyholders. The company’s low incurred claim ratio and high number of claim rejections and complaints suggest that it may not be honoring its policyholders’ claims in a fair and timely manner. As a result, IRDAI’s potential action against Star Health could have significant implications for the company and its policyholders.

Non-life insurers record 2% premium growth in September, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance leads the way

The non-life insurance sector in India has reported a modest 1.94% year-on-year growth in gross direct premium to Rs 23,430 crore in September. This growth was driven primarily by an increase in standalone health insurance premiums. The largest general insurer, New India Assurance, saw a 3.5% rise in premiums, while ICICI Lombard General Insurance reported a 6.2% increase. Other state-owned insurers, such as United India Insurance and Oriental Insurance, also reported significant growth, with increases of 23.36% and 4.45%, respectively.

Private general insurers, including Bajaj Allianz General and HDFC Ergo, also reported varying degrees of growth, with Bajaj Allianz General seeing a 31.35% increase and HDFC Ergo experiencing a decline of 3.78%. Standalone health insurers, such as Niva Bupa Health Insurance and Star Health and Allied Insurance, reported growth of 1.45% and 3.36%, respectively.

The government’s recent clarification on Goods and Services Tax (GST) has also had an impact on the industry. Premiums for individual life and health insurance policies are now exempt from GST, making them more affordable for individuals and families. However, this exemption does not apply to group insurance policies, which are typically offered by employers to their employees. Reinsurance services, which insurers purchase to protect themselves, are also exempt from GST.

However, insurers will face a significant adjustment regarding Input Tax Credit (ITC). They will no longer be able to claim ITC for essential input services such as agent commissions, brokerage, and administrative services. This change may have a significant impact on the industry, as insurers will need to adjust their business models to account for the loss of ITC. Overall, the non-life insurance sector is experiencing moderate growth, driven primarily by increases in standalone health insurance premiums, and is adapting to changes in the tax landscape.