The High Court has asked Novo Nordisk to respond to Natco’s request to cancel its patent.
The Delhi High Court has ordered Novo Nordisk, a Danish pharmaceutical company, to respond to a petition filed by Natco Pharma, a Hyderabad-based company, seeking to revoke the patent on the diabetes and anti-obesity drug semaglutide. The patent, which is set to expire in March, has been a subject of controversy, with Natco Pharma claiming that it lacks novelty and that Novo Nordisk is attempting to “evergreen” the patent to extend its exclusivity beyond the primary patent’s expiry.
Novo Nordisk has developed semaglutide and sells it under various brand names, including Wegovy, Rybelsus, and Ozempic, for the treatment of type-2 diabetes and weight loss. The company has regulatory approval to sell Ozempic in India. However, with the patent’s expiry looming, several generic companies, including Natco Pharma, are attempting to manufacture their own versions of the drug.
The Delhi High Court’s Justice Jyoti Singh has issued a notice to Novo Nordisk, directing the company to respond to Natco Pharma’s petition. The case has been listed for further hearing in February. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in India, where there is a growing demand for affordable diabetes and obesity treatments.
Natco Pharma’s petition argues that Novo Nordisk’s patent on semaglutide is not novel and that the company is attempting to extend its exclusivity beyond the primary patent’s expiry. If the court rules in favor of Natco Pharma, it could pave the way for other generic companies to manufacture and sell their own versions of semaglutide, potentially increasing competition and reducing prices for the drug.
The case highlights the ongoing patent disputes in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in India, where generic companies are increasingly challenging the patents of multinational pharmaceutical companies. The outcome of this case will be closely watched by the industry, as it could have significant implications for the availability and affordability of essential medicines in India and beyond.
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries suffers loss in trademark dispute as Bombay High Court rules EsiRaft and Raciraft do not bear deceptive similarities.
The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of Eris Lifesciences, dismissing Sun Pharmaceutical’s claim that Eris’s medication “EsiRaft” infringed on Sun Pharma’s trademark for their medication “Raciraft”. The court found that the names “EsiRaft” and “Raciraft” are not deceptively similar, and therefore, Eris Lifesciences did not infringe on Sun Pharma’s trademark.
Sun Pharma had filed a lawsuit against Eris Lifesciences, alleging that the name “EsiRaft” was too similar to their own medication “Raciraft”, which could cause confusion among consumers. However, the Bombay High Court disagreed, stating that the names are distinct and not likely to cause confusion.
The court noted that the prefix “Esi” in EsiRaft is a well-known abbreviation for Eris Lifesciences, which is a well-established pharmaceutical company. In contrast, the prefix “Raci” in Raciraft is a unique identifier for Sun Pharma’s medication. The court also observed that the suffix “Raft” in both names is a common term used in the pharmaceutical industry to denote a type of medication.
The court’s decision is a significant win for Eris Lifesciences, as it allows the company to continue marketing and selling its medication “EsiRaft” without fear of trademark infringement. The ruling also sets a precedent for the pharmaceutical industry, establishing that minor similarities in medication names do not necessarily constitute trademark infringement.
The case highlights the importance of trademark law in the pharmaceutical industry, where companies invest heavily in developing and marketing their medications. The ruling demonstrates that courts will carefully consider the nuances of trademark law and the potential for consumer confusion when determining whether a trademark infringement has occurred.
In conclusion, the Bombay High Court’s decision in the case of Sun Pharma vs. Eris Lifesciences is a significant victory for Eris Lifesciences, allowing the company to continue marketing its medication “EsiRaft” without fear of trademark infringement. The ruling sets a precedent for the pharmaceutical industry and highlights the importance of careful consideration of trademark law in determining whether a trademark infringement has occurred.
PolyPeptide forms partnership with Lupin | Speciality Chemicals Magazine
PolyPeptide, a leading manufacturer of peptides, has formed a strategic alliance with Lupin Manufacturing Solutions. The partnership aims to establish a framework for long-term cooperation, focusing on integrated procurement and supply planning for select raw materials. This alliance will enable PolyPeptide to diversify its sourcing options for key materials, including metabolites, and create a more robust and flexible supply chain for peptide manufacturing.
The demand for peptides has been increasing, and this alliance will help PolyPeptide to better meet the growing needs of its customers. By collaborating with Lupin Manufacturing Solutions, PolyPeptide will be able to secure a stable supply of essential raw materials, reducing its dependence on a single supplier and minimizing potential risks.
This partnership is the second significant collaboration announced by PolyPeptide in recent times. The company has also signed a collaboration agreement with Lifecore Biomedical, a contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO). The agreement combines PolyPeptide’s expertise in peptide manufacturing and development with Lifecore’s capabilities in formulation, fill-finish, and packaging.
The partnership with Lifecore Biomedical will provide US-based manufacturers of peptide drugs with an integrated, end-to-end solution. The collaboration will enable a seamless transition between drug substance and drug product, streamlining the manufacturing process and reducing costs. By offering a comprehensive solution, PolyPeptide and Lifecore Biomedical aim to become the preferred partners for companies developing peptide-based drugs.
The financial details of both alliances have not been disclosed. However, these partnerships demonstrate PolyPeptide’s commitment to enhancing its capabilities and expanding its reach in the peptide manufacturing market. By forming strategic alliances with other industry leaders, PolyPeptide is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for peptides and maintain its position as a leading manufacturer in the industry.
The alliances with Lupin Manufacturing Solutions and Lifecore Biomedical will enable PolyPeptide to improve its supply chain, reduce costs, and offer a more comprehensive range of services to its customers. As the demand for peptides continues to increase, PolyPeptide’s strategic partnerships will play a crucial role in driving its growth and success in the market.
National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority Caps Retail Price of Sun Pharma’s Gemcitabine Injections
The National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) has set the retail price for Sun Pharma’s Gemcitabine injections. Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy medication used to treat various types of cancer, including pancreatic, breast, ovarian, and non-small cell lung cancer. The NPPA, which is responsible for regulating the prices of pharmaceutical products in India, has fixed the retail price of Sun Pharma’s Gemcitabine injections to ensure that the medication is affordable for patients.
The price fixation is a significant move, as it will help to make the life-saving medication more accessible to cancer patients in India. Gemcitabine is a critical component of cancer treatment, and its high cost has been a significant burden on patients and their families. The NPPA’s decision is expected to provide relief to patients who are struggling to afford the medication.
The retail price of Sun Pharma’s Gemcitabine injections has been fixed at a level that is significantly lower than the existing market price. This will result in significant savings for patients who are undergoing cancer treatment. The price reduction is expected to benefit thousands of patients who are dependent on Gemcitabine for their treatment.
The NPPA’s decision is in line with the government’s efforts to make healthcare more affordable and accessible to all. The authority has been working to regulate the prices of pharmaceutical products, including cancer medications, to ensure that they are affordable for patients. The price fixation of Gemcitabine is a significant step in this direction and is expected to have a positive impact on the healthcare sector.
The move is also expected to promote competition in the market, as other pharmaceutical companies may be forced to reduce their prices to remain competitive. This will ultimately benefit patients, who will have access to affordable and high-quality medication. The NPPA’s decision is a significant development in the pharmaceutical sector and is expected to have a positive impact on the healthcare industry as a whole.
Overall, the NPPA’s decision to fix the retail price of Sun Pharma’s Gemcitabine injections is a welcome move that will benefit cancer patients in India. The price reduction will make the medication more accessible and affordable, and will help to reduce the financial burden on patients and their families. The move is in line with the government’s efforts to make healthcare more affordable and accessible, and is expected to have a positive impact on the healthcare sector.
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.