{"id":222770,"date":"2026-02-05T00:37:25","date_gmt":"2026-02-05T00:37:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2026\/02\/05\/the-supreme-court-has-stayed-an-order-directing-an-insurer-to-pay-rs-82-80-lakh-to-cricketer-s-sreesanth-on-account-of-an-injury-he-sustained-during-the-indian-premier-league-ipl-2012\/"},"modified":"2026-02-05T00:37:25","modified_gmt":"2026-02-05T00:37:25","slug":"the-supreme-court-has-stayed-an-order-directing-an-insurer-to-pay-rs-82-80-lakh-to-cricketer-s-sreesanth-on-account-of-an-injury-he-sustained-during-the-indian-premier-league-ipl-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2026\/02\/05\/the-supreme-court-has-stayed-an-order-directing-an-insurer-to-pay-rs-82-80-lakh-to-cricketer-s-sreesanth-on-account-of-an-injury-he-sustained-during-the-indian-premier-league-ipl-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court has stayed an order directing an insurer to pay Rs 82.80 lakh to cricketer S Sreesanth on account of an injury he sustained during the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2012."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has stayed an order by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) that directed an insurance company to pay Rs 82.80 lakh to a company that had contracted players for the Indian Premier League (IPL) team Rajasthan Royals. The claim was made due to a knee injury suffered by cricketer S Sreesanth during a practice match in 2012, which made him unfit to play in the tournament. The insurance company, United India Insurance Co. Ltd, had repudiated the claim citing a pre-existing toe injury that was not disclosed by the company.<\/p>\n<p>The NCDRC had passed an order in April directing the insurance company to pay the claim, stating that the repudiation was a deficiency in service. The commission noted that the policy covered loss of fees and remuneration due to non-appearance in the tournament, and that the injury was sustained during the policy period. The commission also stated that the surveyor&#8217;s report had concluded that the injury was a sudden and unforeseen event, and that the claim was within the purview of the policy terms and conditions.<\/p>\n<p>However, the Supreme Court has now stayed the NCDRC&#8217;s order, observing that Sreesanth did not play for a single day in the 2012 IPL tournament. The court has fixed the matter for hearing and stayed the effect and operation of the impugned order until further orders. The insurance company had filed a plea against the NCDRC&#8217;s order, arguing that the claim was wrongly allowed.<\/p>\n<p>The case highlights the complexities of insurance claims and the need for careful consideration of policy terms and conditions. The NCDRC&#8217;s order had noted that the repudiation of the claim was based on a pre-existing toe injury that was not established to have occurred or recurred during the period of insurance cover. The Supreme Court&#8217;s stay order suggests that the court may take a closer look at the circumstances surrounding the injury and the insurance claim. The matter is expected to be heard further, and the final outcome will depend on the court&#8217;s interpretation of the policy terms and conditions, as well as the evidence presented by the parties involved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has stayed an order by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) that directed an insurance company to pay Rs 82.80 lakh to a company that had contracted players for the Indian Premier League (IPL) team Rajasthan Royals. The claim was made due to a knee injury suffered by cricketer S Sreesanth [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":221269,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insurance","category-united-india-insurance"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/04\/united-india-insuracne.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9ibIB-VX4","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222445,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/17\/rajasthan-royals-vs-insurer-over-sreesanth-injury-heads-to-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":222770,"position":0},"title":"Rajasthan Royals vs insurer over Sreesanth injury heads to Supreme Court","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Rajasthan Royals cricket team has been embroiled in a decade-long legal battle with United India Insurance Company over an injury claim for former player S Sreesanth. The case dates back to 2012, when Sreesanth suffered a knee injury during a practice match, causing him to miss the season. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222506,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/25\/the-national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission-ncdrc-has-criticized-pnb-metlife-for-allegedly-using-a-forged-death-certificate-in-a-life-insurance-policy-case-worth-rs-11-4-lakh\/","url_meta":{"origin":222770,"position":1},"title":"The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has criticized PNB MetLife for allegedly using a &#8216;forged&#8217; death certificate in a life insurance policy case worth Rs 11.4 lakh.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has criticized PNB MetLife for allegedly using a forged death certificate in a life insurance policy case. The case involves a policy with a coverage amount of Rs 11.4 lakh. The insured individual had purchased the policy, but unfortunately, they passed away. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222510,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/25\/ncdrc-orders-united-india-insurance-to-pay-rs-2-35-crores-for-cancelled-cricket-match\/","url_meta":{"origin":222770,"position":2},"title":"NCDRC Orders United India Insurance to Pay Rs. 2.35 Crores for Cancelled Cricket Match","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The National Consumer Commission has ruled in favor of the Andhra Cricket Association, holding United India Insurance Co. Ltd. liable for deficiency in service. The insurance company had wrongfully rejected a claim related to the cancellation of a One Day International cricket match that was scheduled to take place on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222528,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/27\/the-supreme-court-has-ruled-that-an-insurance-company-is-not-liable-to-pay-compensation-in-cases-where-the-death-of-a-person-occurs-due-to-their-own-rash-and-negligent-driving\/","url_meta":{"origin":222770,"position":3},"title":"The Supreme Court has ruled that an insurance company is not liable to pay compensation in cases where the death of a person occurs due to their own rash and negligent driving.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court of India has ruled that insurance companies are not responsible for paying compensation to the families of drivers who die as a result of their own reckless or negligent driving. This decision was made in a case where a man, N S Ravisha, died in a car\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222436,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/16\/madras-high-court-rules-that-deceaseds-family-cant-claim-compensation-from-insurance-company-if-deceased-was-solely-responsible-for-accident-due-to-negligent-driving\/","url_meta":{"origin":222770,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court Rules That Deceased&#8217;s Family Can&#8217;t Claim Compensation From Insurance Company If Deceased Was Solely Responsible For Accident Due To Negligent Driving","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Madras High Court has ruled that an insurance company is entitled to retrieve the compensation amount deposited in a motor accident case where the deceased was solely responsible for the accident due to negligent driving. The case involved a Toyota Qualis Car that met with an accident in 2009,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222426,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/15\/insurance-companies-are-not-liable-to-pay-compensation-for-deaths-caused-by-rash-driving-according-to-a-ruling-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":222770,"position":5},"title":"Insurance companies are not liable to pay compensation for deaths caused by rash driving, according to a ruling by the Supreme Court.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court of India has ruled that insurance companies are not obligated to pay compensation to victims who die due to rash and negligent driving. This decision was made in a case where a man, N.S. Ravisha, died in a car accident on June 18, 2018, while driving at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222770"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222770\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/221269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}