{"id":222528,"date":"2025-12-27T16:42:39","date_gmt":"2025-12-27T16:42:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/27\/the-supreme-court-has-ruled-that-an-insurance-company-is-not-liable-to-pay-compensation-in-cases-where-the-death-of-a-person-occurs-due-to-their-own-rash-and-negligent-driving\/"},"modified":"2025-12-27T16:42:39","modified_gmt":"2025-12-27T16:42:39","slug":"the-supreme-court-has-ruled-that-an-insurance-company-is-not-liable-to-pay-compensation-in-cases-where-the-death-of-a-person-occurs-due-to-their-own-rash-and-negligent-driving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/27\/the-supreme-court-has-ruled-that-an-insurance-company-is-not-liable-to-pay-compensation-in-cases-where-the-death-of-a-person-occurs-due-to-their-own-rash-and-negligent-driving\/","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court has ruled that an insurance company is not liable to pay compensation in cases where the death of a person occurs due to their own rash and negligent driving."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court of India has ruled that insurance companies are not responsible for paying compensation to the families of drivers who die as a result of their own reckless or negligent driving. This decision was made in a case where a man, N S Ravisha, died in a car accident after driving rashly and negligently. His family had claimed Rs 80 lakh in compensation from the insurance company, but the court dismissed their petition.<\/p>\n<p>According to the court, the family members of the deceased cannot demand an insurance payout when the death is caused by the deceased&#8217;s own mistake, without any external factors being involved. The court upheld the decision of the Karnataka High Court, which had previously rejected the family&#8217;s claim for compensation.<\/p>\n<p>The accident occurred on June 18, 2014, when Ravisha was driving a Fiat Linea at high speed, breaking traffic rules and losing control of the vehicle. He succumbed to his injuries, and his family claimed compensation, citing his high monthly income as a contractor. However, the police investigation and the Motor Accident Tribunal both concluded that the accident was caused by Ravisha&#8217;s rash and negligent driving.<\/p>\n<p>The Karnataka High Court had stated that when a claim is made by the legal representatives of the deceased, it must be proven that the deceased was not responsible for the accident through their own rash and negligent driving. The court also emphasized that the insurance company&#8217;s liability is dependent on the policy covering the deceased.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the court found that the accident was caused by Ravisha&#8217;s own reckless driving, and therefore, his family was not entitled to compensation. The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision sends a strong message to drivers who engage in daredevil stunts or drive negligently, warning them that they will not be able to claim insurance compensation in the event of an accident.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court of India has ruled that insurance companies are not responsible for paying compensation to the families of drivers who die as a result of their own reckless or negligent driving. This decision was made in a case where a man, N S Ravisha, died in a car accident after driving rashly and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9ibIB-VTa","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222426,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/15\/insurance-companies-are-not-liable-to-pay-compensation-for-deaths-caused-by-rash-driving-according-to-a-ruling-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":222528,"position":0},"title":"Insurance companies are not liable to pay compensation for deaths caused by rash driving, according to a ruling by the Supreme Court.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court of India has ruled that insurance companies are not obligated to pay compensation to victims who die due to rash and negligent driving. This decision was made in a case where a man, N.S. Ravisha, died in a car accident on June 18, 2018, while driving at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222436,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/16\/madras-high-court-rules-that-deceaseds-family-cant-claim-compensation-from-insurance-company-if-deceased-was-solely-responsible-for-accident-due-to-negligent-driving\/","url_meta":{"origin":222528,"position":1},"title":"Madras High Court Rules That Deceased&#8217;s Family Can&#8217;t Claim Compensation From Insurance Company If Deceased Was Solely Responsible For Accident Due To Negligent Driving","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Madras High Court has ruled that an insurance company is entitled to retrieve the compensation amount deposited in a motor accident case where the deceased was solely responsible for the accident due to negligent driving. The case involved a Toyota Qualis Car that met with an accident in 2009,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222391,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/10\/the-supreme-court-has-ruled-that-the-split-multiplier-concept-is-not-applicable-in-the-motor-vehicles-act-and-should-not-be-used-by-tribunals-or-courts-when-calculating-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":222528,"position":2},"title":"The Supreme Court has ruled that the Split Multiplier concept is not applicable in the Motor Vehicles Act and should not be used by tribunals or courts when calculating compensation.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the concept of a \"split multiplier\" is not applicable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, when calculating compensation for victims of motor accidents. The court made this decision while awarding enhanced compensation to the wife and children of a man who died\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222414,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/13\/the-gujarat-high-court-has-issued-a-notice-to-an-insurance-company-in-connection-with-the-harni-lake-boat-tragedy\/","url_meta":{"origin":222528,"position":3},"title":"The Gujarat High Court has issued a notice to an insurance company in connection with the Harni Lake boat tragedy.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Gujarat High Court has issued a notice to United India Insurance Company Ltd in relation to the Harni Lake boat capsizing incident that occurred on January 18, 2024. The incident resulted in the loss of 14 lives, including 12 school children and two teachers, during a school picnic. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222442,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/17\/a-court-has-ruled-in-favor-of-a-family-whose-child-underwent-foot-surgery-determining-that-the-condition-was-congenital-rather-than-developmental-and-as-a-result-the-insurance-company-is-liable-to\/","url_meta":{"origin":222528,"position":4},"title":"A court has ruled in favor of a family whose child underwent foot surgery, determining that the condition was congenital rather than developmental, and as a result, the insurance company is liable to cover the costs.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A consumer complaint was filed by Sandeep Pai, a resident of Bengaluru, against IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance and Paramount Health Services after they denied his 15-year-old son Mukund's corrective foot surgery claim. The insurers claimed that the problem was a congenital defect present from birth, which was not covered under the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;IFFCO Tokio&quot;","block_context":{"text":"IFFCO Tokio","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/iffco-tokio\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222449,"url":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/2025\/12\/18\/delhi-high-court-has-ruled-that-a-government-circular-cannot-limit-insurance-coverage-and-has-ordered-an-insurer-to-pay-the-balance-of-a-covid-19-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":222528,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court has ruled that a government circular cannot limit insurance coverage, and has ordered an insurer to pay the balance of a COVID-19 claim.","author":"Team Small News","date":"December 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of a policyholder, Reena Goel, who had filed a petition against United India Insurance Company Limited for not reimbursing her full Covid-19 hospitalization claim. The court observed that a government circular issued during the pandemic, which regulated hospital charges, cannot be used\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Insurance&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Insurance","link":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/category\/insurance\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smallnews.in\/insurance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}